To the Editor:
In this election year, and as our planet warms, Joe Biden’s plan and the House Committee Report: Solving the Climate Crisis, are both getting increased media coverage. However, both plans are missing a piece that would make both plans successful: a carbon pricing component.
There are now two studies–the Energy Innovation study by the non-partisan Energy Innovation: Policy and Technology firm, and the Resources for The Future study by a non-profit conducting research in energy and natural resources issues. They show that without a carbon pricing component, the House Select Committee’s climate plan is unlikely to reach its own stated goals. Alternatively, H.R. 763, the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019 (EICDA) contains a critical market-based carbon pricing component that will reduce America’s emissions by at least 40% in the first 12 years while returning the fees collected from carbon producers to each citizen, not the federal government, thereby benefitting low and middle income Americans.
As a member of the Portland chapter of the Citizens’ Climate Lobby, I’m writing to heighten awareness of the EICDA that to date has 81 sponsors in the House of Representatives. I urge everyone to learn more about this well-researched bill that already has momentum building in the United States Congress.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763
Martha Petersen
Portland
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less