Two brothers, Lionel and Norm Guay, served at the same time as mayors of the Twin Cities. They were visionaries and saw the possibility of making Lewiston-Auburn one family. They created the L-A Joint Services Commission, on which I served with nine others from both cities. We worked tirelessly for two years and our report showed that, by consolidating city services, significant savings could be gained.
That was followed by the Citizens Commission on L-A Cooperation. Its work determined that $2.7 million could be saved over five years. I was serving as mayor of Lewiston when elected naysayers successfully sabotaged the effort behind the scenes. There went the savings.
Robert Reed and Ron Potvin, who now serve on the Coalition Opposed to L-A Consolidation, disputed the numbers then, claiming Reed’s calculations showed savings of $1.7 million. A meeting with them showed that, in fact, $2.7 million could be saved. Reed was quoted in the Sun Journal on Oct. 25, 2008, saying, “I was a high skeptic. I said that the group was able to identify $1.7 million in savings at best. But today, I feel like it’s more in the $2.5 to $3 million range.”
Reed and Potvin were skeptics then and they are skeptics now. They always seem to come up with “fuzzy math” to kill progress by scaring the electorate.
Robert Kennedy once said “Some men see things as they are and say why; but I dream things that never were and say why not.”
I dream about One L-A.
Larry Gilbert Sr., Lewiston
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less