NORWAY — Bail was set at $1,000 cash, or personal recognizance with a Maine pretrial contract, Monday afternoon at 11th District Court for a Norway man charged with aggravated assault for the second time in four months.
Matthew J. Wightman, 31, was charged with Class B aggravated assault, punishable by up to 10 years in prison.
His conditions of release included no contact with the victim, no possession of dangerous weapons, and being subject to random search and testing.
Wightman’s arrest on Friday came a little more than 24 hours after the state dismissed a separate aggravated assault charge stemming from an incident in May, where Wightman hit a man over the head with a shovel and threatened to slit a woman’s throat.
According to the dismissal form, the case was dismissed due to “insufficient evidence.”
Norway police officer Stephen Cronce wrote in an affidavit that on the evening of Friday, Sept. 24, he responded to a call at 17 Cottage St. that Wightman had stabbed a man with a knife during an altercation.
Cronce wrote that several people told him that Wightman cut the victim with a knife on the neck and his right arm.
The victim was taken to Stephens Memorial Hospital, where he received seven stitches and a cast for a severe arm sprain.
Cronce wrote that witnesses to the incident saw Wightman stab the victim while the victim was trying to defend himself. Another witness said that after Wightman stabbed the victim, he said he was going across the street to get a gun from his apartment.
Wightman said that he got into a fight with the victim after the victim, along with other people at 17 Cottage St., assaulted him first, Cronce wrote.
“Wightman states that he never pulled a knife on anyone,” Cronce added.
Cronce said he arrested Wightman, and after taking him back to the jail, Wightman admitted to drinking earlier that evening to celebrate his aggravated assault charge from May being dismissed.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less