To the Editor:
In several of the columns “The Chamber Beat,” Mr. Williams continues to beat the drum stating that LD 553 is a, to use his terms, “a bad bill.” Yet he does not give the reader a full understanding of the bill, but only a few out of context snipits of the proposed bill. LD 553 is named “Act to end at will employment.” It requires employers to provide employees a copy of a written personnel policy, with a list of offenses that the employee may be terminated for. The employer may terminate an employee immediately if:
1. the employee has violated any state law;
2. in the judgement of the employer, the employee has endangered safety, harmed the reputation of the business, limited the ability of the business to operate;
3. violated the written policy of the business.
These are not “limited exceptions”, as Mr. Williams states. “At will” employment means that an employer can, for any reason, terminate an employee. This bill, LD 553, allows the employee to know, in writing, the rules of the business before employment.
In reference to LD 1343, all states tax lodging. It is a state tax and only affects those staying in lodging and who can afford a modest one time tax increase. It’s effect on “killing local business” is pure conjecture.
Mr. Williams fails to give the reader all the facts about LD 553 or LD 1343. Go online, read the bills, then make a fair and balanced judgement.
Mike Schobinger
Norway
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less