LGBT protesters

In this Oct. 8, 2019, file photo, protesters gather outside the Supreme Court in Washington where the Supreme Court is hearing arguments in the first case of LGBT rights since the retirement of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy. LGBT-rights activists are looking ahead as they celebrate a major victory in the Supreme Court regarding job discrimination, They hope the June 15, 2020, decision spurs action against other forms of bias against their community and undermines the Trump administration’s near-total ban on military service by transgender people. AP file photo

As someone who supports LGBT rights, I believe it’s a big step forward, one that I hope compels companies that continue to discriminate to change their ways.

But, as research by myself and others shows, there was already a powerful reason to do so: More inclusive workplaces tend to perform better than those that aren’t.

Creating inclusiveness

How can organizations be more inclusive?

Based on my research in diversity in sports organizations, which spans 20 years, I believe a good start is putting strong policies in place that make it clear that discrimination based on one’s sexual orientation is always inappropriate.

This also means regular education and training on these policies, which helps encourage more interpersonal interactions around the issue and challenging discussions that force people to confront their own prejudices.

Leaders also play a key role, as they model what inclusiveness looks like and hold people accountable for their actions.

Inclusive workplaces also tend to instill this spirit throughout the organization, from its mission statement to how it conducts employee evaluations.

A path to success

In a 2019 study, a colleague and I examined LGBT inclusion at 65 of the biggest university athletic departments in the U.S. and compared it with how well their teams performed in the gym or on the field.

We measured inclusion by looking at factors like department nondiscrimination policies, the existence of LGBT-focused resources and a fan code of conduct that explicitly prohibits homophobic, transphobic and sexistbehavior. We measured performance with team wins and losses.

We found that as LGBT inclusiveness increased, so too did the overall success of the school’s teams.

The benefits were especially positive when the state in which the university was located had a high number of sexual minority residents and low levels of bias toward LGBT individuals.

Equally important was what we did not find. Specifically, LGBT inclusion did not hurt performance when the state didn’t have a large gay population or when bias was high. Put another way, there were only positives — and no negatives — associated with having an inclusive workplace.

These findings are consistent with our previous sports-related empirical workexperimental studies and in-depth case studies.

Inclusion beyond sport

This connection between work environments that are supportive and welcoming to LGBT individuals and better performance isn’t limited to sport organizations.

Researchers in human resource managementbusiness ethics and organizational psychology have all come to similar conclusions.

For example, in a study of thousands of companies, researchers found that LGBT inclusion also correlates with employee productivity, profitability and business performance. Other research has shown companies recognized for their inclusive efforts see higher stock prices as well as more success in recruitment and retention.

And, naturally, LGBT people working in inclusive workplaces experience less discrimination and prejudice, making it easier for them to be authentic at work, which helps improve psychological well-being.

So although the Supreme Court has finally and firmly banned LBGT discrimination, companies that have already embraced more inclusive workplaces have long been reaping the benefits.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.

Comments are no longer available on this story

filed under: