I believe that any decision by a member of Congress to boycott the inauguration is a disgrace. One of the triumphs of the U.S. is a form of government was established that allows for the orderly, peaceful transfer of power on a regular basis. Part of the way the Constitution was written was to prevent the frequent violent attempts to overthrow kings and the wars that resulted that characterized so much of European history.

The inauguration ceremony is a testimony to a critical part of the Constitution. It is not about the person being inaugurated; it is about the office of the presidency and the peaceful transfer of power within the executive branch of government.

As I read the oath, taken by members of Congress, they have sworn in a similar fashion. They did not swear to support and defend the sitting president or a political party. They swore to support and defend the Constitution.

I believe that all members of Congress have a duty, as representatives of the people, to stand in testimony of the inauguration as a hallmark of our great Constitution.

The inauguration ceremony is not about the person who has been elected. It is about the Constitution and the people who Congress represents.

Ken St. Andre, Auburn

Comments are no longer available on this story

filed under: